header-logo header-logo

Family portraits

18 October 2007 / Donna Whitehead
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

What is legally recognised as a “family” today?
Donna Whitehead reports

The image of the traditional family, encompassing a heterosexual married couple and their children, is often captured in family portraits. The reality of family life today, however, is very different. At the recent Labour Party conference, prime minister Gordon Brown said that he stood for a Britain that supports all families, and during his first speech as leader of the Labour Party, he indicated his intention to strengthen family life.

CHANGING FACE OF FAMILY LIFE

If a person is asked to list members of their family, they might identify those to whom they are genetically related. Equally they may consider their family to be those who live in the same household, despite the lack of any genetic link. They may include individuals whom they support financially or emotionally, irrespective of genetics or residence. These assorted groups are more likely today to be recognised as a family unit.

In terms of demographics, the Office for National Statistics has recently reported in Families—Focus on Families that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll