header-logo header-logo

Family Law Update

08 February 2007 / Diane Watanabe
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

PARENTAL CHILD ABDUCTION
RE D (A CHILD) (ABDUCTION: RIGHTS OF CUSTODY)

THE CHILD’S WELFARE

When dealing with the resolution of disputes over children the child’s welfare must be the court’s paramount consideration under s 1(1) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989). Section 1(3) provides a welfare checklist to which the court must have regard whenever it is considering a s 8, ChA 1989 order. Of particular relevance is s 1(3)(a), ChA 1989, which stipulates that the court must have regard to the “ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child concerned (in the light of his age and understanding)”.

Consequently, where children are thought to be sufficiently mature, the court must give due weight to their views in a s 8, ChA 1989 application. Historically this approach has been rather different to the approach adopted in cases governed by the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 (the Hague Convention). What, therefore, is the approach adopted by the Hague Convention?
 

THE REVISED BRUSSELS II

The Revised Brussels II Regulation (Council Regulation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll