header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007 / Diane Watanabe
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family Law Update

PARENTAL CHILD ABDUCTION
RE D (A CHILD) (ABDUCTION: RIGHTS OF CUSTODY)

THE CHILD’S WELFARE

When dealing with the resolution of disputes over children the child’s welfare must be the court’s paramount consideration under s 1(1) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989). Section 1(3) provides a welfare checklist to which the court must have regard whenever it is considering a s 8, ChA 1989 order. Of particular relevance is s 1(3)(a), ChA 1989, which stipulates that the court must have regard to the “ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child concerned (in the light of his age and understanding)”.

Consequently, where children are thought to be sufficiently mature, the court must give due weight to their views in a s 8, ChA 1989 application. Historically this approach has been rather different to the approach adopted in cases governed by the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 (the Hague Convention). What, therefore, is the approach adopted by the Hague Convention?
 

THE REVISED BRUSSELS II

The Revised Brussels II Regulation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll