header-logo header-logo

Family law: home of the brave?

07 February 2025 / Rachel Buckley
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Family , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
207182
Creative approaches & daring action can lead to surprisingly positive outcomes for clients, writes Rachel Buckley

As a company, we operate with a core value of ‘brave’—something we believe is relevant to every area of our business as family lawyers. Beyond the law, the essence of resilience and bravery is key to our businesses and client success. It is a fascinating exercise to look at how this concept essentially pervades the daily work of a family law firm, to recognise the many situations where a family lawyer needs to be brave, even when they don’t realise it.

Leaning into difficult conversations

Family lawyers are often required to have difficult conversations with clients, conversations in which the client is resistant or unwilling to accept the facts—for example, managing expectations or ensuring they are not being manipulated. In a divorce, for instance, when emotions are high and there’s plenty of information and questions to process, a spouse can be manipulated or controlled without them realising what is happening.

In this situation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll