header-logo header-logo

01 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Family
printer mail-detail

Family courts in crisis

Lawyers have highlighted the heartache behind devastating family court statistics

Official family court statistics for January to March 2021, published last week, revealed 71,707 family cases were started, up seven per cent on the same quarter in 2020. The rise was due to a 29% increase in financial remedy, 15% rise in domestic violence, 5% rise in private law, 2% rise in matrimonial and 1% rise in adoption cases. The number of public law case starts decreased by 7%.

Care and supervision cases took an average of 43 weeks to include, up eight weeks on the same quarter in 2020, and well above the required 26 weeks. Only one in five cases were disposed of within 26 weeks, down 14% on the same period in 2020.

Nick Manners, partner at Payne Hicks Beach, said the figures were ‘further evidence that the family courts are close to breaking point.

‘It is a perfect storm with an increase in cases coming in at a time when the courts are struggling to cope due to funding cuts. As an adviser, we see daily that the delays cause significant and increased stress to families and couples who are seeking resolution through the courts for serious issues, particularly in cases involving domestic violence or challenging divorces.’

Susi Gillespie, partner at Thomas Mansfield Solicitors, said: ‘The average time frame from a petition to decree nisi is 27 weeks and from petition to decree absolute is 51 weeks. The time frame from petition to decree nisi is still too long.’

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce called on the government to ‘maximise the existing court capacity, boosting it through Nightingale courts to allow more in person hearings to take place safely’ and ‘ensure so far as possible that there are sufficient fee-paid and full-time judges to deal with existing and new caseloads’.

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll