header-logo header-logo

Fair trial

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Pan v WestLB AG UKEAT/0308/11/DM, [2011] All ER (D) 100 (Aug)

It was established law that the test to be applied in determining bias was whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased. If an objection of bias was made, it was the duty of the tribunal to consider the objection and exercise his judgment upon it. As a matter of discretion, save for compelling reasons, an employment judge in a case which had started before a full panel should, if he was asked to order a hearing before a different panel, ensure that the decision was taken by the whole panel. The question of bias did not simply depend on whether or not the party said that he lacked confidence, but on whether substantively, there were good grounds for such confidence to be lacking.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll