header-logo header-logo

Expert witness availability & trial dates

15 August 2019 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Chris Pamplin serves up a master class on how to avoid diary clashes in & out of court

  • The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 1998 place a duty on the parties to a case to assist the court in the listing of cases for trial, and this would include expert witness availability.

Fixing of trial dates has always been a difficult task. A court has to juggle with numerous variables to ensure that the date fixed complies with the need to deal with cases efficiently and promptly and without incurring unnecessary cost. It must also have regard to the availability of witnesses (including expert witnesses) and allow sufficient time for the parties to properly prepare and carry out any necessary pre-trial steps.

An expert’s instructing solicitor should, of course, obtain from the expert a list of any unavailable dates. If the solicitor does not ask for these, the expert should be proactive in supplying them. It would also be prudent to offer the reasons for unavailability. Naturally, experts must notify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll