header-logo header-logo

Expert water matters

07 July 2017 / Richard Hurst
Issue: 7753 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
nlj_7753_hurst

Richard Hurst provides an expert introduction to the world of construction products & the water industry

During the late 80s the EU considered the use of products used within the building industry and introduced the Construction Products Directive (CPD) (Council Directive 89/106/EEC). The Directive was designed to improve the safety of building design and the products used and to harmonise the national laws of the EU member states to ensure free movement of goods used by the European construction industry.

The CPD covered a wide range of products, ranging from the tiles on the roof to the hinges on the door, the glass of a shower screen or glue for door veneers: it applied to any product ‘produced for incorporation in a permanent manner in construction works, including both buildings and civil engineering works’.

On 1 July 2013, the CPD was withdrawn and replaced by the Construction Products Regulation (305/2011/EU). The objectives of the replacement Regulation remain those of the Directive. Implications for water arise from regulatory issues as well as health and safety. Water

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll