header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Expert advice

Individual and business consumers will play a key role in shaping the future regulation of lawyers.

Individual and business consumers will play a key role in shaping the future regulation of lawyers.

In a first for the legal profession, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has appointed an independent eight-member consumer panel to help shape the regulatory framework of lawyers.

The consumer panel, which will be chaired by Dr Dianne Hayter, the former vice-chairman of the financial services consumer panel, will operate independently of the LSB and will work to develop a sharper focus on consumer interests.

It will publish its advice. If the LSB chooses to ignore this advice, it will be required to justify its decision in a published written statement.

Hayter, who was appointed to her post in July, said the panel would assess proposals “from the standpoint of users of legal services”.

The establishment of the Panel is a statutory requirement of the Legal Services Act 2007.

The experience of Panel members covers trading standards, housing, business advice, employment law, health care, policing and refugee policy.

Panel appointees include: Carol Brady, a director at the Local Better Regulation Office; Graham Corbett, senior national officer at the Commercial Services Union; Paul Munden, who has held senior board posts at Business Link; and Karin Woodley, the former chief executive of the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust.
 

Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll