header-logo header-logo

EU—Jurisdiction—Civil & commercial matters

07 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Schmid v Hertel C-328/12 [2014] All ER (D) 221 (Jan)

Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber), 16 Jan 2014

Under Art 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 (on insolvency proceedings) (the Regulation), courts of the member state within the territory of which insolvency proceedings have been opened have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action to set a transaction aside by virtue of insolvency brought against a person whose place of residence is not within the territory of a member state.

The applicant was the liquidator of the debtor’s assets, appointed in insolvency proceedings in Germany in May 2007. The respondent resided in Switzerland. The applicant brought an action against the respondent before the German courts seeking to have a transaction set aside and to recover a sum of money plus interest as part of the debtor’s estate. The action was dismissed as inadmissible at first instance and on appeal on the ground that the German courts lacked international jurisdiction. The applicant appealed to the German Federal Court of Justice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll