header-logo header-logo

EU—Employment

09 May 2014
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lyreco Belgium NV v Rogiers C-588/12, [2014] All ER (D) 32 (May)

On the true construction of cl 2.4 of the framework agreement on parental leave, set out in the annex to Council Directive (EC) 96/34 (on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by the European Union Trade Confederation, the Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederations of Europe and the European Centre of Employers and Enterprises) (the Framework Agreement), which was set out in the annex to the Directive, read in the light both of the objectives of that Framework Agreement and of cl 2.6 thereof, it was contrary to that provision for the fixed-sum protective award payable to a worker on a part-time parental leave, where the employer unilaterally and without compelling or sufficient reason terminated that worker’s full-time contract of indefinite duration, to be determined on the basis of the reduced salary earned by that worker at the date of the dismissal. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll