header-logo header-logo

EU consumer conundrum

13 October 2011
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers voice concerns over new “common European sales” law

Lawyers have spoken out against plans to introduce a second tier of contract law across member states.

The new “common European sales” law, proposed by the European Commission this week, would supplement domestic contract law. The aim is to break down obstacles, such as divergent sales laws, which the Commission claims act as a costly hindrance to cross-border trade, particularly for small firms.

The Commission also claims that traders who are dissuaded from undertaking cross-border transactions due to contract law obstacles forgo at least €26bn in intra-EU trade every year. It estimates that 500 million consumers in Europe lose out on greater choice and lower prices because fewer firms make cross-border offers, particularly in smaller national markets.

Member states would be required to make the new EU law available for sale of goods contracts in which a consumer is involved, or where at least one party is a small or medium enterprise (SME). The law would apply only where contracting parties agree that it should.

However, lawyers fear the proposals could create extra legal complexity and effectively undermine consumer rights.

Vanessa Knapp at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer says: “The market seems to be pointing to other factors, like language barriers and VAT complexities, to account for any missed cross-border trade opportunities, rather than the absence of contract law uniformity.

“One additional concern for UK businesses is how the new proposals’ key principles of good faith and fair dealing, defined as a standard of conduct characterised by honesty, openness and consideration for the interests of the other party, reconcile with the UK principles of legal certainty and freedom of contract. Many businesses have not yet thought about the difficulties the proposals could bring.”

Peter Lodder QC, chairman of the Bar, said that the Council would continue to challenge the evidential need and legal basis for the implementation of such a contract law. “Different contract laws are not a high-priority for the vast majority of SMEs, particularly in the present economic climate,” he said. “What we can be certain of is that the European sales law will increase costs for all and lead to less certainty in law; a double whammy which is in nobody’s interests.”
 

Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll