header-logo header-logo

EU—Agriculture

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Panellinios Sindesmos Viomikhanion Metapiisis Kapnou v Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon and another C-373/11, [2013] All ER (D) 197 (Sep)

It was settled EU case law that Art 34(2) EC, which prohibited all discrimination under the common agricultural policy, was merely a specific expression of the general principle of equal treatment, which required that comparable situations should not be treated differently and different situations not treated alike unless such treatment was objectively justified. Further, member states might adopt provisions in a situation governed by EU law where that law expressly conferred on them decision-making powers. The prohibition on discrimination was not concerned with any disparities in treatment which might result, between the member states, from divergences existing between the legislation of the various member states, so long as that legislation affected equally all persons subject to it. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll