header-logo header-logo

Equity—Receipt of trust property—Unconscionable receipt

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 64 (Jan)

Chancery Division, Stephen Morris QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), 11 Jan 2012

The receipt by the defendant of European Union Allowances (EUAs) from the claimant occasioned by third party fraud was unconscionable in circumstances where the defendant willfully and recklessly failed to make such inquiries as an honest and reasonable man would make.

Luke Harris (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant. Victor Joffe QC (instructed by Myers & Sons Solicitors) for the defendant.

The claimant was a company with its registered office in Germany. The defendant was a company registered in England. In January 2010, 21,000 carbon emission allowances known as European Union Allowances (EUAs) were transfered from the claimant’s own carbon emissions account at the German emissions trading scheme registry to the defendant’s carbon emissions account at the UK greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme registry. The transfer was effected as a result of an e-mail fraud perpetrated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll