header-logo header-logo

Equal pay injustice

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Public

The government is to allow councils to raise £455m through the capitalisation of assets in order to meet their equal pay liabilities.

The money raised by councils that borrow against or sell assets will be used to make a one-off back-payment to thousands of employees, the majority of whom are women, and complete their duties under local pay reviews.

Local government minister John Healey says: “Local government workers have
the legal right to fair pay like anyone else, but some councils have let unequal pay persist for decades … workers should get the equal pay to which they are entitled.”

Dave Prentis, general secretary of UNISON says that the scheme shows the government is serious about delivering equality. processes,” he adds.

Issue: 7339 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll