header-logo header-logo

14 October 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Employment , Privilege
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 14 October 2022

97423
Can documents retrospectively acquire legal professional privilege? Not without a time machine, says Ian Smith in this month’s brief
  • Early conciliation certificates in multiple cases.
  • Legal professional privilege—no retrospective effect.
  • Reconsideration of judgments and default by a representative.
  • Possible bias by an Employment Appeal Tribunal side member.

Employment case law in the last month has concentrated largely on matters of procedure, rather than substance. The first two cases show that, in fields as intensively ploughed as these, very particular points can still arise for determination at appellate level. They concern applying the early conciliation rules to multiple cases, and whether legal professional privilege can ever apply retrospectively to documents which as initially produced were not privileged. The third and fourth cases concern fairly well-established rules (on reconsideration of judgments and possible bias by a side member) but provide particularly interesting examples, with the odd twist.

Early conciliation certificates

The judgment in Clark and Others v Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd and Another [2022] EAT 143 starts by expressing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll