header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 17 August 2016

17 August 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

Following the EU referendum, Ian Smith advises employment lawyers to keep calm & carry on

  • CJEU pronouncements on potentially important aspects of working time/annual leave law.
  • The effect of a successful appeal against dismissal.
  • Whose mind/motivation is to be imputed to the employer in a case of dismissal?

The more perceptive reader may have noticed certain political developments in the last couple of months that could have an impact in the future on our employment law. The key point at the moment is the word “future” because no-one knows how this will all eventually pan out, let alone when. From a purely legal point of view, the position currently is simple—nothing changes purely as a result of the referendum. The UK remains a full member of the EU, Directives continue to apply and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) retains its jurisdiction. Even when things start to change, we must bear in mind that (i) much of existing statutory employment law is home-grown anyway,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll