header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 29 January 2015

29 January 2015 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
smith_2

Ian Smith addresses discrimination & considers a cautionary tale for employees

The most newsworthy decision as at the end of last year was clearly that of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Kaltoft v Kommunernes Landsforening C-354/13 which received by and large a hostile reception in the press along the lines of “EU says that obese people are disabled”. As always, it is not quite so simple, but it has led also to more considered criticisms in employer and health circles. As it happens, last month also saw a not-dissimilar judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on the question of caste discrimination, again raising a myriad of possible implications which will have to be considered in future litigation. The third case considered here again concerns discrimination, this time the requirement to make reasonable adjustments in disability cases, but the difference is that this one may act as a shot across the bows to employees rather than employers, in cases of long-term sickness absence.

The decision on obesity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll