header-logo header-logo

Employment

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hellewell and another v Axa Services Ltd and another UKEAT/0084/11/CEA, [2011] All ER (D) 89 (Aug)

The words “properly payable” in s 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 referred to a legal, but not necessarily a contractual, entitlement on the part of the employee to the payment. Consideration of whether there was a sum legally payable in accordance with s 13(3) of the Act was an exercise which had to be completed before s 13(1) and (2) of the Act could apply and it was only if the answer was in the affirmative that there had to be a consideration as to whether there was a deduction from that sum so as to invoke s 13(1) and (2). That conclusion was supported by the use of the word “deduction” in s 13(1) and (3) of the Act as that indicated a reduction of sums otherwise payable pursuant to the legal entitlement of the employee in question.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
back-to-top-scroll