header-logo header-logo

Emergency powers scrutiny

23 September 2021
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The Cabinet Office has defended the government’s handling of the pandemic, in its response to the Lords' Constitution Committee’s report on coronavirus (COVID-19) and the use and scrutiny of emergency powers
The Committee made recommendations on parliamentary scrutiny, safeguards, alternative drafting practices, increased clarity and reviewing the emergency legislation. The government said all emergency legislation is kept under consideration and they will schedule the necessary debates as soon as parliamentary time allows.

On the Committee’s recommendation the government set out the rationale for using the urgent procedure under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 in the explanatory memorandum, the Cabinet Office said: ‘No two public health emergencies will be the same, so it is difficult to predict what would be reasonable and proportionate in the event of future disease outbreaks.’

Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll