header-logo header-logo

Emergency powers scrutiny

23 September 2021
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The Cabinet Office has defended the government’s handling of the pandemic, in its response to the Lords' Constitution Committee’s report on coronavirus (COVID-19) and the use and scrutiny of emergency powers
The Committee made recommendations on parliamentary scrutiny, safeguards, alternative drafting practices, increased clarity and reviewing the emergency legislation. The government said all emergency legislation is kept under consideration and they will schedule the necessary debates as soon as parliamentary time allows.

On the Committee’s recommendation the government set out the rationale for using the urgent procedure under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 in the explanatory memorandum, the Cabinet Office said: ‘No two public health emergencies will be the same, so it is difficult to predict what would be reasonable and proportionate in the event of future disease outbreaks.’

Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll