header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / Anthony Lavers , David Thomas , Miles Keeping
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Environment , Property
printer mail-detail

Efficiency drive

David Thomas QC, Miles Keeping and Anthony Lavers review the Energy Performance of Buildings Regulations

The Energy Performance of Buildings (Certificates and Inspections) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/991) (the EPB regulations) and the Home Information Pack Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/992) (the HIP regulations) are the two statutory instruments that the government has introduced to implement the EU’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2002/91/EC (the Directive). They are significant because when, and if, they take full effect they will create a number of new duties for commercial and residential property owners affecting property sales and rentals.

CREATING A LOW CARBON ECONOMY

The purpose of the EPB regulations is to “encourage owners and tenants to choose energy efficient buildings when seeking new accommodation and to improve the performance of buildings they occupy” (Department for Communities and Local Government circular 02/2007). The EPB regulations represent one of many instruments in the government’s ambitious agenda to create a low carbon economy. The reduction of carbon emissions is a topical issue, subject to wide media

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll