header-logo header-logo

20 May 2022 / James Halstead , Marcin Durlak
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail

Eat your fingers off & other tales

81960
James Halsted & Marcin Durlak on the legal dangers of getting lost in translation

We all love those fabulously entertaining stories about marketing slogans disastrously mistranslated for foreign markets. Who can forget the urban myth of Vauxhall Nova misfiring in Spain because No Va means It doesn’t go in Spanish? According to legend, its name had to be changed to Corsa in Spain due to all the embarrassment. In reality though, the car model was referred to as Corsa in the Spanish market from the outset— so, perhaps Vauxhall’s marketing campaign was actually pretty on the ball from the get-go. Meanwhile, it’s said that its rival, Ford, had little success with its slogan in Belgium, whereby the English-Belgian translation supposedly turned Every car has a high-quality body into Every car has a high-quality corpse. Arguably, the latter doesn’t quite set the scene for a wholesome family road trip. In a similarly morbid translation gone wrong, Pepsi Cola’s Come Alive! You’re in the Pepsi generation strapline allegedly became Pepsi

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll