header-logo header-logo

E-mail REGULATIONS

18 January 2007
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , Company
printer mail-detail

In brief

UK directors face fines if their companies have missed a 1 January deadline to update their websites and e-mail signatures to include information required under new regulations.

The Companies (Registrar, Languages and Trading Disclosure) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/3429) transpose the European First Company Law Amendment into UK law. They require every company to list its company registration number, place of registration and registered office address on its website and in e-mails. Such information is already required on business letters but the regulations extend it to websites, order forms and electronic documents including e-mail.

Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , Company
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll