header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

Draft Directive threatens casual workers

News

Renewed EU and union pressure to resurrect the draft Agency Workers Directive could jeopardise up to 250,000 UK temporary placements, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) says.

The draft Directive proposes putting agency workers on an equal footing with permanent staff after six weeks on an assignment. This, says the CBI, would reduce the key benefit of flexibility such workers offer to firms, undermining the incentive to employ them. EU government officials meet this week to discuss a Portuguese Presidency paper, which proposes ways to resurrect the Directive.

The 2007 CBI/Pertemps annual employment trends survey of over 500 firms, which between them employ 1.1 million staff, shows that at any time 3% of employees are temporary.

However, 58% of employers said such a law would lead to a “significant” cut in the use of temporary workers. Of the firms surveyed, 62% said the Directive in its current form would damage flexibility, 65% believed it would significantly increase costs and 58% said it would mean additional bureaucracy. The CBI’s deputy director-general, John Cridland, says: “As proposed, the Directive would seriously undermine the flexibility that temps offer to firms, hurting the economy and making them far more likely to rely on overtime flexibility from existing workers instead.”

The survey also reveals that 95% of employers are offering at least one form of flexible working practice. The most dramatic increase has been in teleworking—staff working on the move or from home—which is now offered by almost half (46%) of employers, four times as many as in 2004 (11%).

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll