header-logo header-logo

28 April 2015
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Dominic Swallow—Just Costs

dominic_swallow

New associate joins Chesterfield office

Just Costs Solicitors has appointed highly regarded costs lawyer Dominic Swallow as an Associate, based in their Chesterfield office.
 
Dominic, who joins from Century Costs Consultants, has considerable experience in almost all areas of costs and litigation funding. He is nationally acknowledged as an expert on costs and has considerable experience in lecturing and training, having spent the last six years as the principal lecturer on costs for Central Law Training Limited.
 
During his 15 years in the costs industry, Dominic has gained a wealth of extensive and diverse experience. While his practice has mainly been related to civil costs he has also gained experience of family costs (both publicly and privately funded), group litigation costs, commercial costs, criminal costs and tribunal costs, in particular in relation to actions within the Lands Tribunal. Dominic has dealt with bills of costs and costs litigation in all courts, up to the Supreme Court, in cases ranging from a few thousand pounds to in excess of £1m.

Paul Shenton, managing director at Just Costs, says: “Dominic is a well respected costs lawyer who brings further strength in depth to our expanding team. In addition to his fee earning work, Dominic will also be providing training both internally and externally. He is a welcome addition to the firm.”

Dominic says: “Having met with Paul and other members of the senior management team I am excited to join Just Costs at a time when there are so many exciting developments on the horizon.
 
“The costs world is in a state of flux at present but it is clear that Just Costs has a clear plan to navigate the forthcoming challenges. I am looking forward to assisting in the future development and growth of the firm.”

 

Issue: 7650 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll