header-logo header-logo

25 August 2015 / Simon Duncan
Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Dodgy dealings

Where next for FX claims, asks Simon Duncan

For many litigators, news that several of the world’s largest banks had been found guilty of manipulating the foreign exchange rates by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) was thought likely to lead to a new rash of claims against those banks. Progress however, appears to have been slow.

Hurdles

In terms of the legal issues, a parallel can be drawn with claims against banks for interest rate swaps mis-selling. Many of the same legal issues arise. However, on a practical level any successful FX claim needs to get over the following additional hurdles:

Take any currency pair, sterling/dollar at 1.6044 for example (one pound buys 1.6044 dollars). A manufacturer in England selling goods to America receives payment in dollars. He buys sterling from his bank in England with those dollars. If we ignore the bid/offer spread, a million dollars buys £623,285.96 at that exchange rate.

It is alleged that the sterling/dollar rate has been manipulated, say from 1.6044 to 1.6088. This would mean that the manufacturer receives £621,581.30

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll