header-logo header-logo

20 August 2015 / Athelstane Aamodt
Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The doctor will sue you now

Athelstane Aamodt examines the legal implications of Chelsea FC’s treatment of its club doctor

José Mourinho caused a lot of controversy recently when he banned the club’s doctor, Dr Eva Carneiro, from attending Chelsea’s football matches or training sessions. The reason for the furore around this ban is that Carneiro seems to have been punished very publicly for doing absolutely nothing wrong.

The facts of the incident are well-known: Carneiro and Jon Fearn (the club’s physiotherapist) ran on to the pitch during Chelsea’s 2–2 draw with West Bromwich Albion to attend to Eden Hazard. Chelsea were already down to ten men, and Mourinho angrily remonstrated with the medical team, given that it would mean that the medical attention would cause Chelsea to be temporarily reduced to nine men.

Carneiro was, according to The Daily Telegraph, told on the Tuesday after the match that she would no longer be attending training sessions or matches as club doctor.

Many employment lawyers have probably asked themselves: has Carneiro been constructively dismissed by Chelsea FC?

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll