header-logo header-logo

Divorce form E

23 December 2015
Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

An error in a divorce form has been uncovered by the Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals.

Family practitioners are advised that an error has been identified in the automatic calculations used in Form E (financial statement) on the HMCTS Form Finder website. This is the form where parties disclose their assets and liabilities. The current online version has been corrected.

The Ministry asked anyone concerned about the impact on their court proceedings to contact them at: formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk.

Kim Beatson, head of family law at Anthony Gold, said family practitioners tend not to use the Ministry of Justice version of the form, and would always verify any supporting documents. However, the error could affect litigants in person as they are more likely to use the Ministry form.

Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll