header-logo header-logo

Divided we fall

26 February 2010 / David Tyme
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

David Tyme reports on a clash of personal belief & official duty

In Ladele v London Borough of Islington the Court of Appeal had to resolve a conflict between the right not to be discriminated against on the grounds of religion or belief, and sexual orientation (see [2009] EWCA CIP 1357, [2009] All ER (D) 148 (Dec)).

Ms Ladele commenced employment with the London Borough of Islington (LBI) in 1992. In November 2002 she became a registrar of births, marriages and deaths and as such held a statutory office.

After the introduction of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) on December 5 2005, LBI was obliged to ensure that sufficient registrars were appointed to carry out the function of civil partnership registrars. Ms Ladele, a Christian, held the view that marriage is the union of a man and a woman and therefore was unable to reconcile her faith with her duties which she viewed as enabling same-sex unions contrary to God’s Law.

Prior to CPA 2004 coming into force, Ms Ladele made it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll