header-logo header-logo

Dishonesty rises as firms struggle

04 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SRA executive director issues warning over growing trend for improper practices

The number of reports of solicitor dishonesty has nearly doubled in the last two years due to financial pressures on the profession, according to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Samantha Barrass, SRA executive director, said the misuse of client money or assets was a particular concern.

“When market conditions are tough and financial problems begin to bite, individuals who are usually principled and ethical can succumb to pressures and temptations, getting drawn into dishonest practices that put their clients, their businesses and their future at risk,” she said, 

Barrass was speaking at the launch of the SRA’s first annual assessment of the profession, Risk Outlook, this week.

Some 30% of all interventions in the last five years involved suspected dishonesty while nearly half included breaches of the accounts rules, and “the trend is growing”, she said.

In response, the SRA has a whistle-blowing policy, operates a “red alert” hotline, and has introduced the role of the compliance officer for finance and administration.

Barrass warned that, where dishonesty is found, the solicitor responsible would “almost invariably be struck off”.

The SRA has divided the risks facing the profession into “current”, “emerging” and “potential” categories.

The most significant current risk is financial failure. The SRA is receiving “more and more” reports of firms in trouble, and is currently working with 51 firms where “the likelihood of a costly intervention is very high”. It has also identified about 2,000 firms that are “particularly susceptible” to financial difficulty, for example, because of over-reliance on a particular area.

Barrass said some behaviours increased risk, including “management weakness, such as excessive concentration of power, limited sharing of information, inadequate budgetary controls and failure to adapt to a changed market or the changing needs of employees”.

Examples of emerging risks include poor succession planning and a poor standard of service and legal advice.

Barrass said potential risks include group contagion—a risk increased by the rise in mergers, ABSs and complex business structures—as well as “improper or abusive litigation, lack of due diligence over outsourcing arrangements [and] lack of transparency in complex business structures”.

Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll