header-logo header-logo

Digitalisation not working

03 November 2017
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail
nlj_7768_cover

Live links do not work, sound or vision drops, video is ‘hopeless’ where defendants have language difficulties, and defendants are uncommunicative or take out their anger with ‘a face on the screen’. Writing in this week’s NLJ, Roger Smith, former director of Justice, describes some of the problems with the criminal court digitalisation process, and backs charity Transform Justice’s report into the state of digitalisation. Transform Justice has called for the government’s digitalisation process to be stopped. Smith calls on the senior judiciary to add their voices so the process can be paused pending further research.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll