header-logo header-logo

The deposit! Don't let this happen to your client

30 May 2014 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Alec Samuels provides some points of reference for trouble-free conveyancing

In the usual situation the deposit is paid by the purchaser P to the vendor V on the exchange of contracts, and the transaction runs smoothly. Complications may arise where, as a term of the contract, V (or P) has to obtain planning permission or V has to build the flat and make it ready for occupation. When the planning permission will be issued is uncertain until it happens; when the flat will be ready is uncertain until it happens. The deposit was to be paid 60 days after planning permission was obtained. Planning permission was obtained. V then served a five-day notice making time of the essence and requiring payment of the deposit. P did not pay.

The Court of Appeal held that as a matter of law the payment of the deposit is a condition of the contract, a fundamental term. The five-day notice was fair and reasonable, and made time of the essence. Failure by P to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll