header-logo header-logo

09 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Delay refused for fixed-cost civil reforms

MoJ ignores Law Society pleas to delay RTA Portal expansion

The RTA Portal expansion will go ahead on 31 July as planned despite Law Society pleas for the changes to be delayed due to lack of information.

Law Society President, Lucy Scott-Moncrieff warned last week that, with just weeks to go, the government was yet to publish its final version of the procedure rules and explain what transitional provisions would be in place.

Scott-Moncrieff said she has so far seen only a draft of the new protocols, and that solicitors faced “an impossible task of advising their clients about procedures and costs liabilities”.

However, NLJ understands that the Civil Procedure Rules Committee signed off its final version of the rules on Friday, that they have now gone to the Minister for sign-off before being laid before Parliament on Wednesday, and that “no dramatic changes” have been made to the draft version.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson confirmed this week that the reforms will go ahead as planned.

On 31 July, employer’s liability and public liability cases will be brought into the RTA Portal scheme, and the limit will rise from £10,000 to £25,000.

Fixed recoverable costs for the work will be slashed from £1,200 to £500 for cases worth up to £10,000, with £800 recoverable for cases worth up to £25,000, and £900 and £1,600 recoverable for low- and high-value employer’s and public liability cases.

Issue: 7568 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll