header-logo header-logo

Deal or no deal?

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Herring discusses enforcing

As the family lawyer trudges home after many hours of work his heart is slightly lighter because the day involved a sensible negotiated settlement of a complex case. There were handshakes all round, and although no one was delighted, or even happy, there was a sense of relief that a deal had been struck that was just about acceptable to everyone. But our lawyer’s lightness of heart may be forgotten the next morning when greeted by news that the other side has decided to pull out of the agreement. Inevitably the client will want to know: are they allowed just to pull out of the agreement having shaken hands on it?

Consent orders
Well, yes, is the answer. Until the court makes a consent order, the agreement of the parties is not legally binding. That is why it is sensible to get a consent order made as soon as possible after the agreement has been reached. A judge might be persuaded that if a party pulls out of a negotiated settlement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll