header-logo header-logo

Deal or no deal?

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Herring discusses enforcing

As the family lawyer trudges home after many hours of work his heart is slightly lighter because the day involved a sensible negotiated settlement of a complex case. There were handshakes all round, and although no one was delighted, or even happy, there was a sense of relief that a deal had been struck that was just about acceptable to everyone. But our lawyer’s lightness of heart may be forgotten the next morning when greeted by news that the other side has decided to pull out of the agreement. Inevitably the client will want to know: are they allowed just to pull out of the agreement having shaken hands on it?

Consent orders
Well, yes, is the answer. Until the court makes a consent order, the agreement of the parties is not legally binding. That is why it is sensible to get a consent order made as soon as possible after the agreement has been reached. A judge might be persuaded that if a party pulls out of a negotiated settlement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has secured £1.1m in its first use of an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO)

back-to-top-scroll