header-logo header-logo

Dangerous liaisons

13 February 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7828 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
Dominic Regan provides an updated cut out & keep guide to surviving sanctions

Somewhere, somehow, someone is in default. Where a sanction applies, they are in deep trouble. The 2013 Jackson reforms were intended to promote compliance, and that is why the measures about default and relief were rewritten.

Nasty traps

The most common default is the failure to serve witness statements in time. They are ubiquitous. Not every case requires a budget or expert evidence, but written factual evidence is a necessity. The nasty trap with witness statements is found in the underlying rule, CPR 32.10. Failure to serve in time means that one cannot call the witnesses unless forgiveness is obtained. The court order may be expressed in anodyne terms; the sting is lurking every time in the rule.

Appreciate that it could get even worse. The sanctions decision to beware of is Gladwin v Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 104 (Jun), where Turner J—someone plainly destined for elevation to the Court of Appeal—struck out a liability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll