header-logo header-logo

Cutting it

03 November 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan returns to the consequences of the referral fee chop

My recent article about this topic provoked more interest than anything I have ever written. I return to the topic for much has happened since the government announced that it was going to ban the payment of referral fees.

Meanwhile, in a fiery talk delivered last month, Jack Straw stated that the claims management companies which thrive on the lucrative income generated by the commoditisation of claims would not be allowed to circumvent the law.

Self-referral

One possibility I anticipated in my earlier article has seemingly already happened. I understand that some claims companies have decided to buy into law firms and so maintain their income by referring the cases acquired to itself.

There has also been a remarkable change of nomenclature, with several bodies that were receiving referral fees now saying that it is a marketing or advertising fee instead. Those companies, such as Injury Lawyers 4U, which advertises and then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll