header-logo header-logo

Cuts cause capital offence

09 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

High Court rules London Councils not meeting equality duties

Plans to cut vital grants for more than 400 voluntary sector groups that help London’s poorest and weakest are unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Mr Justice Calvert-Smith ruled that London Councils failed to meet its statutory equality duties when it decided to cut its London Boroughs Grant Scheme by £10m. All the decisions were quashed including decisions to stop funding 213 projects run by 177 different organisations.

Calvert-Smith J ordered London Councils to “undertake a lawful process of reconsideration in accordance with the public sector equality duties”, and that no funding was to be terminated until “three months after the conclusion of the lawful consideration process”.

London Councils must therefore re-run its consultation process, this time with full equality impact assessments.

The case, R (Hajrula and Hamza) v London Councils [2011] EWHC 151, is the first to look at local authority equality duties since the coalition government introduced its cuts package.

London Voluntary Service Council’s chief executive Peter Lewis says the case sets an excellent precedent:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll