header-logo header-logo

Crunch decision

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In brief

Pringles are not potato crisps and thus are free from VAT, the High Court has ruled. Procter & Gamble (P&G), the makers of the tubed snack, brought the case after the VAT and Duties Tribunal ruled that the Pringle was subject to the standard 17.5% rate of VAT because it was “a potato crisp product”. However, Mr Justice Warren ruled that under the 1994 VAT Act, to be subject to VAT, a product “must be wholly, or substantially wholly, made from the potato”. Pringles do not satisfy this definition since they have a potato content of only about 42%, he said.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll