header-logo header-logo

01 May 2024
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , ADR
printer mail-detail

Cruise claim couple urged to settle

Three Court of Appeal judges have urged a couple whose cruise in Arctic Canada was diverted due to icy conditions to ‘reach a pragmatic settlement’ rather than continue through the courts

Rosemary and Nicholas Sherman, who are representing themselves, booked a cruise to the Northwest Passage with travel company Reader Offers Ltd (ROL). They brought a claim for a refund and compensation after their ship missed the majority of advertised destinations, instead exploring the west coast of Greenland.

Handing down judgment last week in Sherman and another v Reader Offers Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 412, however, Lord Justice Males warned the couple that any compensation was likely to be ‘modest’.

Commenting on the proportionality of the case, he said: ‘I am concerned that a claim about a cruise in which nobody died or was injured or suffered any lasting damage has now occupied seven days in the County Court, two days in the High Court and a further two days in the Court of Appeal, and that a yet further hearing will be required before it can be concluded.

‘It is not for us to apportion responsibility for this… I would note, however, that the court has done what it could to help the parties to resolve this dispute without this time-consuming and expensive litigation.

‘As early as 18 February 2020, Deputy District Judge Loughbridge made an order that “At all stages the parties must consider settling this litigation by any means of Alternative Dispute Resolution (including Mediation)”.

‘Such orders are now increasingly common and must be taken seriously… we urged the parties to reach a pragmatic settlement so that they can put this case behind them… I would repeat that urging. Even now it is not too late.’

Both Lady Justice Asplin and Lord Justice Underhill also urged the parties to reach a pragmatic settlement.

Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll