header-logo header-logo

Crown Court unlimited

27 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The cap on the number of days the Crown Court can sit during a financial year has been lifted for a second year, in order to tackle the backlog of cases

Last year, the Crown Court sat for an extra 17,000 cases (about 98,500 days compared to 82,000 in 2019/20). The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is also keeping 30 Nightingale courtrooms open until March 2023.

The Crown Court backlog stands at about 60,000, and the MoJ aims to reduce the backlog to 53,000 by March 2025.

In a report published this week, Court Capacity, however, the House of Commons Justice Committee said the government needs to set out how many trials must take place each month and set out a ‘detailed roadmap of how the necessary increase in capacity will be secured’, if it is to achieve this target.

The committee said the MoJ’s decision to reduce the number of Crown Court sitting days in 2019 was ‘a mistake and should serve as a lesson’ for future decision making.

Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll