header-logo header-logo

Criminal litigation

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Crowch v DPP [2008] EWHC 948 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 205 (Apr)

Correction from last Law Digest (see NLJ 2 May 2007, pp 630–631). An order, under s 19(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, (POA 1985) for costs incurred as a result of an unnecessary or improper act or omission by or on behalf of a prosecutor cannot be made to compensate an unrepresented defendant for his own loss of time in preparing his case and attending court (the reasoning in R v Bedlington Magistrates’ Court ex p Wilkinson [1999] 164 JP 156, construing of POA 1985, s 16 applies equally to s 19).

                                                                              

Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll