header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LAW

29 February 2008
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

S v DPP [2008] All ER (D) 119 (Feb)

The case arose out of offensive material posted on the internet. The complainant was unaware of its existence until it was drawn to his attention some five months later by a police officer.

HELD The offence under the Public Order Act 1986, s 4A(1)(b) (intentionally displaying a visible representation which causes harassment, alarm or distress) may be established even where the harassment, alarm or distress crystallises only at the date several months after the act complained of. Moreover, it could not be said that the police had broken that chain of causation five months later by showing the complainant the photograph.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has secured £1.1m in its first use of an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO)

back-to-top-scroll