header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LAW

14 March 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v W Stevenson & Sons (A Partnership) and others [2008] EWCA Crim 273, [2008] All ER (D) 351 (Feb)

In so far as business activities are conducted in the name of a partnership and the partnership has identifiable assets that are distinct from the personal assets of each partner, there is no reason why a partnership should not be treated, for the purposes of the criminal law, as a separate entity from the partners who are members of it.

The question of whether or not the context permits the word “person” in a criminal statute to be read as including a partnership, might depend critically upon whether or not there is some restriction upon the assets that would properly be available to meet any penalty imposed.

Legislation that renders a partnership liable as an independent entity will lead, in respect of a conviction for a single offence, to the imposition of a single penalty. Conviction of the partnership will not constitute conviction of the individual partners, nor render the individual partners liable to individual penalties.

Where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll