header-logo header-logo

19 January 2022
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal barristers vote for direct action

Barristers will down tools if the government has not agreed by mid-February to raise legal aid fees by the end of March

Nearly 2,000 practitioners (about 80% of the Criminal Bar) responded last week to the Criminal Bar Association’s (CBA’s) seven-day poll on direct action. Their grievance is Ministry of Justice (MoJ) delays in responding to Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid.

In December, Sir Christopher’s review recommended at least £135m extra per year be added to the budget in order to keep the criminal justice system functioning effectively. This would increase funding for solicitors and barristers by 15% above present levels, amounting to an extra £35m in fees.

Sir Christopher said there was ‘no scope for further delay’ in increasing fee rates.

However, the Justice Secretary has said he will not publish a full response until the end of March, followed by a consultation that is unlikely to conclude until the end of June. 

The CBA survey found 96% agreed Sir Christopher’s recommended 15% minimum increase was insufficient to ensure the long-term viability of the Criminal Bar.

Some 96.5% were in favour of taking action including adopting a ‘no returns’ policy as a minimum if the government did not commit to a ‘substantial increase’ in pay rates. 94% favoured action unless the government published a full response to the review, with a timetable for implementation, by 14 February and completed the statutory consultation by the end of March.

CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC and vice-chair Kirsty Brimelow QC said: ‘We have waited too long. We will wait no longer. Solidarity at the Criminal Bar has never been stronger. There is no going back.’

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The 15% increase in criminal legal aid rates recommended in Sir Christopher’s report should be implemented immediately. 

‘If this does not happen, we fear that our members will leave the market at ever faster rates. Criminal defence solicitors have been waiting 25 years for an increase.’

According to MoJ figures, 1,080 firms held a criminal legal aid contract in September 2021 compared to 1,621 firms in September 2012.

Issue: 7963 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll