header-logo header-logo

11 July 2014 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The creditors’ claims (4)

commercial_insolvency_duncan

Simon Duncan concludes his series of articles on the right to sue former directors

Section 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and s 15 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) are derived from the same source and aimed at the same mischief. That is to say, these sections make delinquent directors co-debtors with the company for the company’s debts. In doing this, these sections strengthen creditors’ rights of redress. They allow creditors to act when the evidence suggests that a “phoenix” company has resumed the failed company’s business improperly, or when creditors have lost money in the liquidation of a company run by a disqualified director.

Re Prestige Grindings Ltd

Although the Acts themselves are silent as to who may bring a claim pursuant to these sections, the case law makes it clear that it is the creditors that have the requisite standing (see “The creditors’ claims” 162 NLJ 7530, p 1175 and Re Prestige Grindings Ltd [2006] BCC 421; [2005] EWHC 3076).

Prestige Grinding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll