header-logo header-logo

Cracking the code

22 October 2015 / Sue Nash
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail
nlj_7673_nash

Where are we now with J-codes, asks Sue Nash

“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a [judge] in possession of a good [imagination], must be in want of a [solution]”.

Lord Justice Jackson’s solution to controlling what was seen as the excessive costs of litigation included a call to “harmonise the procedures and systems which we use for costs budgeting, costs management, summary assessment and detailed assessment”.

Following the publication of Jackson LJ’s final report, the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) set up a working party to look into how this might be achieved. Its report in October 2011 recommended that, in the first instance, an England/Wales version of the uniform task-based management system (UTBMS) codes be created as a pre-cursor to any bill of costs being devised.

The committee was then “taken over” by Jeremy Morgan QC and thereafter, comprised a mixture of costs lawyers, solicitors, in-house counsel, e-billing experts and legal software suppliers. Following two years of hard work by this committee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll