header-logo header-logo

18 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Evictions on hold during virus emergency?

The Prime Minister has told MPs the government will legislate to protect renters in the private sector from eviction during the virus outbreak

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions in a sparsely attended House of Commons this week, PM Johnson told Opposition Leader Jeremy Corbyn MP that he would legislate to protect private renters from eviction.

In response to a later request from Siobhain McDonagh MP that he tell the courts to stop s 21 evictions under the Housing Act 1988, the PM said he would be bringing forward legislation to address this point.

Commenting on the proposals, Mark Steggles, partner at law firm Thomson Snell & Passmore said:  "The purpose behind the legislation is to take the pressure off tenants who cannot afford to pay rent as a result of not receiving any income in the current climate.

“Responding to concerns about the impact this may have on landlords, the government confirmed that the 3 month mortgage payment holiday plans announced earlier in the week will now be extended to landlords whose tenants fall into the above category, such as landlords with buy-to-let mortgages.  This avoids the financial pressure being passed from the tenant straight to the landlord and is a shift in government policy.

“The obvious concern is that this doesn’t solve the issue; it simply pushes the issue down the road for 3 months.  To combat this, the government suggests that the legislation will provide that after the 3 month period has expired, landlords and tenants will be expected to work together to establish an affordable repayment plan taking into account the tenants’ individual circumstances.  Further guidance on this point will follow. 

“It appears that possession proceedings that have already been issued will still continue (albeit access to the court for hearings may well be restricted in the coming months) but even if possession orders are obtained, enforcing such orders may prove difficult.  It is also currently unclear whether this legislation will extend to possession proceedings that are unconnected to payment of rent e.g. if the tenant is causing a nuisance.

“The measures proposed by the government will come as a relief to tenants and the fact that the measures for mortgage holidays will also be extended to Buy to Let landlords is sensible.  However, this approach risks storing up trouble when this crisis is over because the interests of the tenant, the landlord and the lender will conflict at that time”.

 

 

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll