header-logo header-logo

12 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Could parliament go virtual?

Parliament should operate virtually, with MPs and Peers working remotely to scrutinise legislation and vote during the COVID-19 pandemic, an independent thinktank has urged

In a paper published last week, the Institute for Government (IfG) calls on Parliamentarians to use video links and speaking lists to continue work in the chamber and select committees. Proxy voting, which is already available to MPs on parental leave, should be expanded to reduce the need to travel to Westminster, it says.

The paper, ‘How could a virtual parliament work?’, also suggests that the government negotiate with opposition parties to re-establish the Liaison Committee or create a body similar to New Zealand’s Epidemic Response Committee to scrutinise the government’s response to COVID-19. The Liaison Committee is made up of all the select committee chairs and holds regular evidence sessions with the Prime Minister.

The government also needs to look into methods for digital voting, as used in other legislatures, as a matter of urgency, the thinktank says.

The paper calls on the government to legislate only where necessary during the pandemic.

Parliament rose a week early for its Easter break, on 25 March, and is due to return on 21 April. While MPs have been practising social distancing by sitting two metres away from each other on the benches, they are required to physically walk through division lobbies to register their votes.

Hannah White, the IfG’s deputy director and author of the report, said: ‘At this time of national crisis, parliament is central to ensuring that government continues to function and maintains public trust. Parliament must innovate to ensure it can continue operating―and be seen to do so―while protecting the health of MPs, peers and staff. That should include exploring options for the introduction of digital voting.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll