header-logo header-logo

12 May 2020 / Veronica Cowan
Categories: Features , Property , Profession , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Conveyancing in times of uncertainty

Gettyimages/iStockphoto

Necessity is the mother of invention for property lawyers during lockdown & beyond, says Veronica Cowan

 

As the stay-at-home measures begin to lift in England and the government takes steps to encourage the re-opening of the home moving market, a plethora of transaction-driven businesses, like conveyancers, estate agents, valuers and removals companies, will continue to suffer the financial pain caused by the COVID-19 outbreak. 

Although the coronavirus pandemic froze the property market, words of hope recently came from global consultancy Knight Frank in a prediction that prices will fall by only 3% and rebound next year. In the South of England, some property sales have been going ahead, although Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government guidance stated that home moves into occupied properties should only occur where contracts have been exchanged and it has proven impossible to agree a deferral. Simon Davis, Law Society president, noted that this reflects the difficulties created by the restricted movement requirements, and that the position is fluid and changing, but would be kept under review. 

Viewing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll