header-logo header-logo

30 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Company directors given breathing space

Insolvency lawyers have welcomed the government’s decision to suspend the wrongful trading law during the COVID-19 pandemic, but raised questions about preferential paying

Currently, directors of limited liability companies can become personally liable for business debts, under the Insolvency Act 1986, if they continue to trade while unable to pay their debts (wrongful trading). There does not need to be any fraudulent intent, only poor judgment or wishful thinking.

Last week, however, the government announced a package of measures for businesses, including suspending wrongful trading provisions for three months, backdated to 1 March, to protect company directors from the threat of personal liability.

Other measures include enabling companies either to hold AGMs online or postpone the meetings, and granting a three-month extension to the filing of company accounts. Business Secretary Alok Sharma said the measures would give bosses ‘much-needed breathing space to keep their workers employed and their companies going’.

Jennifer Marshall, president of the Insolvency Lawyers Association, said: ‘Suspending wrongful trading, in particular, will assist directors in accessing government or bank funding without concerns regarding personal liability.’

Frances Coulson, senior partner and head of insolvency at Moon Beever, said: ‘Everyone is banging on about wrongful trading but no one has really mentioned sanctioning the ability to preferentially pay suppliers.

‘Bad directors often make preferential payments to keep certain suppliers sweet so they transfer over to a newco, dumping other creditors, particularly involuntary creditors such as utilities and local councils as well as HMRC (until this December when HMRC will become a preferential creditor again).’

Coulson said the ‘well-intentioned’ suspension ‘won’t rescue long term abusers of credit, but will help cover the instant crisis.

‘The changes also look as if they will allow preferential payments to suppliers, in order to enable continuation of trading. This needs to be carefully framed, as such preferences are often made solely to shift the business away from creditors rather than to keep the existing company going. Directors need a moratorium now for good reason but must not forget their statutory duties. Consultation with insolvency professionals now might save pain later.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll