header-logo header-logo

Court of protection

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

WCC v GS and others [2011] EWHC 2244 (COP), [2011] All ER (D) 107 (Aug)

When considering contact, the starting point always had to be that there should be full and unrestricted contact between a parent and his or her child and that conditions should only be imposed on that contact if the child’s best interests demanded it. Those conditions had to be reasonable and proportionate having regard to their aim and purpose and the context of the overall situation. When imposing conditions, the court had to have a number of considerations in mind, namely, inter alia, the need for an appropriate review of the conditions, the length to which conditions should address each step of the contact session and the ability of the home or contact supervisor to shorten or lengthen a visit.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll