header-logo header-logo

Court of protection

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

WCC v GS and others [2011] EWHC 2244 (COP), [2011] All ER (D) 107 (Aug)

When considering contact, the starting point always had to be that there should be full and unrestricted contact between a parent and his or her child and that conditions should only be imposed on that contact if the child’s best interests demanded it. Those conditions had to be reasonable and proportionate having regard to their aim and purpose and the context of the overall situation. When imposing conditions, the court had to have a number of considerations in mind, namely, inter alia, the need for an appropriate review of the conditions, the length to which conditions should address each step of the contact session and the ability of the home or contact supervisor to shorten or lengthen a visit.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll